LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:simple_qe_for_dense_linear_orders [2009/04/21 19:32]
vkuncak
sav08:simple_qe_for_dense_linear_orders [2009/04/21 23:59]
vkuncak
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 Formulas $T$ are the formulas that are closed formulas that are true in the structure $(\mathbb{Q},<​)$ or rational numbers. Formulas $T$ are the formulas that are closed formulas that are true in the structure $(\mathbb{Q},<​)$ or rational numbers.
 +
 +**Example:​** ​
 +\[
 +   ​\forall x. \exists y.\ x < y \ \land\ (\forall z. (x < z \rightarrow z=y \lor y < z)
 +\]
 +Is this formula true in dense linear orders? Is there a non-dense linear order where its truth value is different?
  
 ===== Normal form of Formulas ===== ===== Normal form of Formulas =====
Line 23: Line 29:
  
 If we have three concrete values for $x,y,z$, what is the form of the strongest type of a formula that we could write about them in this language? //(atomic type formula)// If we have three concrete values for $x,y,z$, what is the form of the strongest type of a formula that we could write about them in this language? //(atomic type formula)//
 +
 +Theorem: every quantifier-free formula in a language with only relational symbols is a disjunction of atomic type formulas
 +  * if we know the set $T$ of axioms, we may be able to show that the atomic type formulas have a simple form
  
 ===== Quantifier Elimination Step ===== ===== Quantifier Elimination Step =====
  
 +Quantifier elimination from atomic type formulas:
 +
 +Quantifier elimination from more general formulas:
  
   * [[http://​www4.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/​~nipkow/​pubs/​lqe.pdf|Linear Quantifier Elimination]]   * [[http://​www4.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/​~nipkow/​pubs/​lqe.pdf|Linear Quantifier Elimination]]