LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:simple_qe_for_dense_linear_orders [2009/04/21 19:28]
vkuncak
sav08:simple_qe_for_dense_linear_orders [2009/04/21 19:32]
vkuncak
Line 18: Line 18:
 Can we assume that literals are of a special form? Can we assume that literals are of a special form?
  
-**Example:​** simplify ​the formula +**Example:​** simplify ​these formulas: 
-\[ +  * $x < y\ \land\ \lnot (y < z) \ \land\ (x \neq z)$ 
-   x < y\ \land\ \lnot (y < z) \ \land\ (x \neq z) +  * $x < y\land y < x$ 
-\]+ 
 +If we have three concrete values for $x,y,z$, what is the form of the strongest type of a formula that we could write about them in this language? //(atomic type formula)//
  
 ===== Quantifier Elimination Step ===== ===== Quantifier Elimination Step =====