LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:propositional_logic_syntax [2008/03/18 11:10]
vkuncak
sav08:propositional_logic_syntax [2008/03/18 11:16]
vkuncak fixed accidental edit
Line 15: Line 15:
 Notation: when we write $F_1 \equiv F_2$ this means that $F_1$ and $F_2$ are identical formulas (with identical syntax trees). ​ For example, $p \land q \equiv p \land q$, but it is not the case that $p \land q \equiv q \land p$. Notation: when we write $F_1 \equiv F_2$ this means that $F_1$ and $F_2$ are identical formulas (with identical syntax trees). ​ For example, $p \land q \equiv p \land q$, but it is not the case that $p \land q \equiv q \land p$.
  
-In [[Isabelle theorem prover]] we use this ++++ASCII notation for First-Order ​Logic|+In [[Isabelle theorem prover]] we use this ++++ASCII notation for Propositional ​Logic|
 \[ \[
 \begin{array}{c|c} ​ \begin{array}{c|c} ​