LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:non-ground_instantiation_and_resolution [2008/04/01 17:45]
vkuncak
sav08:non-ground_instantiation_and_resolution [2008/04/01 20:09]
vkuncak
Line 31: Line 31:
 Illustration of rules. Illustration of rules.
  
-===== Reducing the Search Space =====+===== Combining Instantiation and Resolution ​=====
  
-More powerful rules.+These two are more powerful rules.
  
-But more choices at each step.+But we therefore have more choices at each step.
  
 If we try to do the proof, how do we know what to instantiate with? ++|we instantiate to enable subsequent resolution rule.++ If we try to do the proof, how do we know what to instantiate with? ++|we instantiate to enable subsequent resolution rule.++
Line 46: Line 46:
 such that $subst(\sigma_1)(A_1) = subst(\sigma_2)(A_2)$. such that $subst(\sigma_1)(A_1) = subst(\sigma_2)(A_2)$.
  
-This rule generalizes resolution and ground resolution.+This rule generalizes ​the above non-ground ​resolution and ground resolution.
  
 Note: if we apply instantiation that renames variables in each clause, then $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ can have disjoint domains and we let $\sigma = \sigma_1 \cup \sigma_2$, obtaining Note: if we apply instantiation that renames variables in each clause, then $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ can have disjoint domains and we let $\sigma = \sigma_1 \cup \sigma_2$, obtaining