LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:proofs_and_induction [2008/02/21 11:21]
vkuncak
sav08:proofs_and_induction [2008/02/21 16:49]
vkuncak
Line 77: Line 77:
 Instead of proving a goal, you can assume its negation and prove any remaining goals (this generalizes proof by contradiction). Instead of proving a goal, you can assume its negation and prove any remaining goals (this generalizes proof by contradiction).
 \[ \[
-\frac{\lnot P \vdash\}+\frac{\lnot P \vdash}
      ​{\vdash P}      ​{\vdash P}
 \] \]
Line 109: Line 109:
 When you have an existentially quantified assumption, you can pick a witness for existential statement and denote it by fresh variable "​x_0"​. ​ Informally we would say "let $x_0$ be such $x$". When you have an existentially quantified assumption, you can pick a witness for existential statement and denote it by fresh variable "​x_0"​. ​ Informally we would say "let $x_0$ be such $x$".
 \[ \[
-\frac{P(x_0)}+\frac{P(x_0) ​\vdash}
      ​{\exists x. P(x) \vdash}      ​{\exists x. P(x) \vdash}
 \] \]