LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:normal_forms_for_propositional_logic [2008/03/09 12:45]
thibaud Filled-in negation-normal paragraph
sav08:normal_forms_for_propositional_logic [2008/03/09 15:03]
thibaud Filled-in Circuits
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 === Disjunctive Normal Form === === Disjunctive Normal Form ===
 +Formulas in Disjunctive-normal form look like this: 
 +$(x_1 \land x_2 \land \lnot x_3) \lor (\lnot x_1 \land x_3 \land x_4) \lor ...$ \\
 +More formally $F = \bigvee^{n}_{i=1} D_i$ where $n \geq 0$. \\
 +Each $D_i$ is a clause and is defined as $D_i = \bigwedge_{j=1}^{n_i} L_{ij}$. \\
 +Each $L_{ij}$ is a literal. It's either an elementary proposition or its negation.
  
-Complete disjunctive normal form and truth tables. +Solving the SAT problem for DNF formulas is in P, but transforming an arbitrary propositional formula to DNF causes an exponential blow-up.
-  * generating ​DNF from truth table +
-  * generating ​DNF by transformations+
  
-=== Conjunctive Normal Form ===+DNF formulas can be easily generated from truth tables. Each row of the truth table that makes the formula true can be written as a clause. Here is an example:  
 +^ $x_1$    ^ $x_2$    ^ $F$ ^ 
 +| 0 | 0 | 0 | 
 +| 1 | 0 | 1 | 
 +| 0 | 1 | 1 | 
 +| 1 | 1 | 0 | 
 +The corresponding formula in DNF is $(x_1 \land \lnot x_2) \lor (\lnot x_1 \land x_2)$
  
-CNF+For a formula over $n$ variables, there are $2^{n}$ rows in the truth table. Over $n$ variables, there are $2^{2^{n}}$ different (i.e. non-equivalent) formulas.
  
-Literal ​Clause.+=== Conjunctive Normal Form === 
 + 
 +Formulas in Conjunctive-normal form look like this:  
 +$(x_1 \lor x_2 \lor \lor x_3) \land (\lnot x_1 \lor x_3 \lor x_4) \land ...$ \\ 
 +It's defined as $F = \bigwedge^{n}_{i=1} \bigvee_{j=1}^{n_i} L_{ij}$ \\ 
 +Like for DNF, $L_{ij}$ are elementary propositions or their negation. The terminology of clauses and literals also applies to CNF.
  
-No polynomial-time equivalence preserving transformation to CNF or to DNF.+There is no polynomial-time equivalence preserving transformation to CNF or to DNF.
  
 === Complete Sets of Connectives === === Complete Sets of Connectives ===
Line 48: Line 62:
 === Circuits === === Circuits ===
  
-Circuits ​(acyclic graph labelled by propositional operatorsand formulas if-then-else ​expression. ​ Fresh variables.+Formulas can be represented as abstract syntax tree (AST) where each node is labeled with an operator that applies to the sub-tree(s). If two sub-trees are identical, instead of duplicating the sub-tree in each place where its used, one can make all the references to this sub-tree point to a unique representation of it. This is called a circuit. 
 + 
 +The if-then-else ​primitive, written $ite(p, q ,r)$, that yields $q$ whenever $p$ is true and $r$ otherwise, can be encoded with the following propositional logic formula: $(p \land q) \lor (\lnot p \land r)$ 
 + 
 +For each node of an AST, it is possible to replace it with a fresh variable, provided that a clause is added that makes sure that the fresh variable and the sub-tree it represents are equivalent.
  
 === Satisfiability-Preserving Transformation === === Satisfiability-Preserving Transformation ===