LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:mapping_fixpoints_under_lattice_morphisms [2008/05/07 10:31]
vkuncak
sav08:mapping_fixpoints_under_lattice_morphisms [2009/03/26 13:53]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Mapping Fixpoints Under Lattice Morphisms ====== ====== Mapping Fixpoints Under Lattice Morphisms ======
 +
 +**Definition:​** Let $(X,\le)$ and $(Y,​\sqsubseteq)$ be complete [[lattices]]. We call $F : X \to Y$ a **complete join-morphism** iff for each set $X_1 \subseteq X$ we have
 +\[
 +   ​F(\sqcup X_1) = \sqcup \{ F(a).\ a \in X_1 \}
 +\]
  
 **Lemma:** Let $(X,\le)$ and $(Y,​\sqsubseteq)$ be complete lattices, and $F : X \to X$, $\Gamma : X \to Y$, $F^\# : Y \to Y$ be complete morphisms (they distribute through arbitrary least upper bound) such that **Lemma:** Let $(X,\le)$ and $(Y,​\sqsubseteq)$ be complete lattices, and $F : X \to X$, $\Gamma : X \to Y$, $F^\# : Y \to Y$ be complete morphisms (they distribute through arbitrary least upper bound) such that
Line 12: Line 17:
 In other words, we can approximate $lfp(F)$ by computing $lfp(F^\#​)$. In other words, we can approximate $lfp(F)$ by computing $lfp(F^\#​)$.
  
-**Definition:​** Height of the lattice is the size of the longest strictly increasing sequence of elements $a_1 \sqsubset a_2 \sqsubset a_3 \ldots$.  ​ 
-Lattice has finite height iff there exists no infinite strictly increasing sequence of elements in the lattice. 
- 
-Observation:​ it is decidable to find least fixpoint of morphism $F^{\#}$ in a lattice with finite height. 
- 
-Lattices with finite height 
-  * finite lattice 
-  * constant propagation lattice