Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
sav08:interpolants_from_resolution_proofs [2008/03/12 13:31] vkuncak |
sav08:interpolants_from_resolution_proofs [2008/03/26 20:26] piskac |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Let $A$, $B$ be sets of clauses such that $A \land B$ is not satisfiable. An interpolant is a formula $H$ such that | Let $A$, $B$ be sets of clauses such that $A \land B$ is not satisfiable. An interpolant is a formula $H$ such that | ||
| * $\models (A \rightarrow H)$ and $H \land B$ is not satisfiable and | * $\models (A \rightarrow H)$ and $H \land B$ is not satisfiable and | ||
| - | * $FV(H) \subseteq FV(A) \cup FV(B)$ | + | * $FV(H) \subseteq FV(A) \cap FV(B)$ |
| Construct resolution tree that derives a contradiction from $A \cup B$. The tree has elements of $A \cup B$ as leaves and results of application of resolution as nodes. For each clause $C$ in resolution tree we define recursively formula $I(C)$ and show that $I(C)$ is interpolant for these two formulas: | Construct resolution tree that derives a contradiction from $A \cup B$. The tree has elements of $A \cup B$ as leaves and results of application of resolution as nodes. For each clause $C$ in resolution tree we define recursively formula $I(C)$ and show that $I(C)$ is interpolant for these two formulas: | ||