LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:hoare_logic [2008/03/03 09:44]
pedagand
sav08:hoare_logic [2009/02/25 14:34]
vkuncak
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 Note: weakest conditions (predicates) correspond to largest sets; strongest conditions (predicates) correspond to smallest sets that satisfy a given property (Graphically,​ a stronger condition $x > 0 \land y > 0$ denotes one quadrant in plane, whereas a weaker condition $x > 0$ denotes the entire half-plane.) Note: weakest conditions (predicates) correspond to largest sets; strongest conditions (predicates) correspond to smallest sets that satisfy a given property (Graphically,​ a stronger condition $x > 0 \land y > 0$ denotes one quadrant in plane, whereas a weaker condition $x > 0$ denotes the entire half-plane.)
 +
  
  
Line 48: Line 49:
 Note the similarity with relation composition. Note the similarity with relation composition.
  
-FIXME Graphical illustration.+{{sav08:sp.png?​400x250|}} 
  
 ==== Lemma: Characterization of sp ==== ==== Lemma: Characterization of sp ====
Line 55: Line 57:
   - $\{P\} r \{ sp(P,r) \}$   - $\{P\} r \{ sp(P,r) \}$
   - $\forall Q \subseteq S.\ \{P\} r \{Q\} \rightarrow sp(P,r) \subseteq Q$   - $\forall Q \subseteq S.\ \{P\} r \{Q\} \rightarrow sp(P,r) \subseteq Q$
 +
  
 ===== Weakest Precondition - wp ===== ===== Weakest Precondition - wp =====
Line 65: Line 68:
 Note that this is in general not the same as $sp(Q,​r^{-1})$ when relation is non-deterministic. Note that this is in general not the same as $sp(Q,​r^{-1})$ when relation is non-deterministic.
  
-FIXME Graphical illustration.+{{sav08:wp.png?​400x250|}}
  
 ==== Lemma: Characterization of wp ==== ==== Lemma: Characterization of wp ====
Line 123: Line 126:
  
   * $sp(P,r) \subseteq Q$   * $sp(P,r) \subseteq Q$
 +
  
 ===== Hoare Triples, Preconditions,​ Postconditions on Formulas and Commands ===== ===== Hoare Triples, Preconditions,​ Postconditions on Formulas and Commands =====
Line 137: Line 141:
  
 We then similarly extend the notion of $sp(P,r)$ and $wp(r,Q)$ to work on formulas and commands. ​  We use the same notation and infer from the context whether we are dealing with sets and relations or formulas and commands. We then similarly extend the notion of $sp(P,r)$ and $wp(r,Q)$ to work on formulas and commands. ​  We use the same notation and infer from the context whether we are dealing with sets and relations or formulas and commands.
 +
 +===== Composing Hoare Triples =====
 +
 +\[
 +\frac{ \{P\} c_1 \{Q\}, \ \ \{Q\} c_2 \{R\} }
 +     { \{P\} c_1 ; c_2 \{ Q \} }
 +\]
  
 ===== Further reading ===== ===== Further reading =====
  
   * {{sav08:​backwright98refinementcalculus.pdf|Refinement Calculus Book by Back, Wright}}   * {{sav08:​backwright98refinementcalculus.pdf|Refinement Calculus Book by Back, Wright}}