Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sav08:exercises_05 [2008/03/18 18:30] vkuncak created |
sav08:exercises_05 [2008/03/25 14:00] piskac |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Exercises 05 ====== | ====== Exercises 05 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Talk by Wei Ngan Chin: "Enhancing Modular OO Verification via Separation Logic" | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Abstract: | ||
| + | Conventional specifications for object-oriented (OO) programs must adhere to behavioral subtyping in support of class inheritance and method overriding. However, this requirement inherently weakens the specifications of overridden methods in superclasses, leading to imprecision during program reasoning. To address this, we advocate a fresh approach to OO verification that focuses on the distinction and relation between specifications that cater to calls with static dispatching from those for calls with dynamic dispatching. We formulate a novel specification subsumption that can avoid code re-verification, where possible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Using a predicate mechanism, we propose a flexible scheme for supporting class invariant and lossless casting. Our aim is to lay the foundation for a practical verification system that is precise, concise and modular for sequential OO programs. We exploit the separation logic formalism to achieve this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| * Homework analysis | * Homework analysis | ||
| Line 6: | Line 17: | ||
| * Monotonicity of semantic consequence | * Monotonicity of semantic consequence | ||
| * Sets of sentences with only finite and with only infinite models | * Sets of sentences with only finite and with only infinite models | ||
| + | * Herbrand universe | ||
| + | * Resolution proofs | ||