LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:deriving_propositional_resolution [2008/03/12 12:58]
vkuncak
sav08:deriving_propositional_resolution [2008/03/19 17:12]
tatjana
Line 3: Line 3:
 We next consider proof rules for checking [[Satisfiability of Sets of Formulas]]. We next consider proof rules for checking [[Satisfiability of Sets of Formulas]].
  
-We extending the notion of [[Substitution Theorems for Propositional Logic|substitution on formulas]] to sets of formulas by+We are extending the notion of [[Substitution Theorems for Propositional Logic|substitution on formulas]] to sets of formulas by
 \[ \[
     subst(\sigma,​S) = \{ subst(\sigma,​F) \mid F \in S \}     subst(\sigma,​S) = \{ subst(\sigma,​F) \mid F \in S \}
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 We first derive a more abstract proof system and that show that resolution is a special case of it. We first derive a more abstract proof system and that show that resolution is a special case of it.
 +
  
 ==== Key Idea ==== ==== Key Idea ====
Line 41: Line 42:
 Then we conclude that $\exists p. S$ is equivalent to $ProjectSet(S,​p)$ defined by Then we conclude that $\exists p. S$ is equivalent to $ProjectSet(S,​p)$ defined by
 \[ \[
-   Proj(S,p) = \{ ProjectForm(F_1,​F_2,​p) \mid F_1,F_2 \in S \}+   ProjectSet(S,p) = \{ ProjectForm(F_1,​F_2,​p) \mid F_1,F_2 \in S \}
 \] \]