LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:axioms_for_equality [2008/04/02 14:51]
vkuncak
sav08:axioms_for_equality [2008/04/02 21:27]
vkuncak
Line 16: Line 16:
 ++ ++
  
-Note: if an interpretation $(D,I)$ satisfies ​$AxEq$, then we call $I(eq)$ (the interpretation of eq) a //​congruence//​ relation for $(D,I)$.+**Definition:** if an interpretation $I = (D,\alpha)$ the axioms ​$AxEq$ ​are true, then we call $\alpha(eq)$ (the interpretation of eq) a //​congruence//​ relation for interpretation $I$. 
 + 
 +**A terminological note:** in algebra, an interpretation is often called a //​structure//​. Instead of using $\alpha$ mapping language ${\cal L} = \{ f_1,​\ldots,​f_n,​ R_1,​\ldots,​R_m\}$ to interpretation of its symbols, the structure is denoted by a tuple $(D,\alpha(f_1),​\ldots,​\alpha(f_n),​\alpha(R_1),​\ldots,​\alpha(R_n))$.  For example, an interpretation with domain ${\can N}$, with one binary operation whose interpretation is $+$ and one binary relation whose interpretation is $\leq$ can be written as $({\cal N},​+,​\leq)$. ​ This way we avoid writing $\alpha$ all the time, but it becomes more cumbersome to describe correspondence between structures.
  
 === Example: quotient on pairs of natural numbers === === Example: quotient on pairs of natural numbers ===