LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:atomic_diagram_normal_form [2009/05/12 22:43]
vkuncak
sav08:atomic_diagram_normal_form [2009/05/12 23:29]
vkuncak
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 We next consider a syntactic normal form that helps us understand the decidability of the combination problem. We next consider a syntactic normal form that helps us understand the decidability of the combination problem.
 +
  
 ===== Flat Form ===== ===== Flat Form =====
Line 21: Line 22:
     C[t] \ \ \leadsto \ \ (x=t) \land C[x]     C[t] \ \ \leadsto \ \ (x=t) \land C[x]
 \] \]
 +
 +**Example:​** Represent ​ $f(x)+y < z$ as
 +\[
 +    x_1 = f(x) \land s_1 = x_1 + y \land s_1 < z
 +\]
 +
 +
  
 ===== Finiteness of Flat Literals with Fixed Variables ===== ===== Finiteness of Flat Literals with Fixed Variables =====
Line 28: Line 36:
 Assume $K$ variables. ($K = |FV(C)|$) Assume $K$ variables. ($K = |FV(C)|$)
  
-Number of $R(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n) ​K^n$+Number of $R(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n)$ is: $K^n
 + 
 +Number of $x=y$ atomic formulas is: $K^2$
  
-Number of $x=yatomic formulas: $K^2$+Number of $x=f(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n)literals is: $K^{n+1}$
  
-Number of $x=f(y_1,\ldots,y_n)$ literals: $K^(n+1)$+Note: if we did **not** have only flat literalswe could have infinitely many atomic formulasbecause of arbitrarily large terms.
  
-Noteif we did not have only flat literalswe could have infinitely many atomic formulas, ​because of arbitrarily large terms.+**Example:** When we have relation symbols $<$ and no function symbolsand consider 3 variables $x$,​$y$,​$z$,​ possible ​atomic formulas ​are: 
 +  * $x=x$, $y=y$, $z=z$, $x=y$, $y=x$, $x=z$, $z=x$, $y=z$, $z=y$ 
 +  * $x<x$, $y<y$, $z<z$, $x<y$, $y<x$, $x<z$, $z<x$, $y<z$$z<y$
  
 ===== Atomic Diagram Normal Form ===== ===== Atomic Diagram Normal Form =====