LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:atomic_diagram_normal_form [2009/05/12 22:43]
vkuncak
sav08:atomic_diagram_normal_form [2009/05/12 23:24]
vkuncak
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 We next consider a syntactic normal form that helps us understand the decidability of the combination problem. We next consider a syntactic normal form that helps us understand the decidability of the combination problem.
 +
  
 ===== Flat Form ===== ===== Flat Form =====
Line 20: Line 21:
 \[ \[
     C[t] \ \ \leadsto \ \ (x=t) \land C[x]     C[t] \ \ \leadsto \ \ (x=t) \land C[x]
 +\]
 +
 +**Example:​** Represent ​ $f(x)+y < z$ as
 +\[
 +    x_1 = f(x) \land s_1 = x_1 + y \land s_1 < z
 \] \]
  
Line 28: Line 34:
 Assume $K$ variables. ($K = |FV(C)|$) Assume $K$ variables. ($K = |FV(C)|$)
  
-Number of $R(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n) ​K^n$+Number of $R(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n)$ is: $K^n$
  
-Number of $x=y$ atomic formulas: $K^2$+Number of $x=y$ atomic formulas ​is: $K^2$
  
-Number of $x=f(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n)$ literals: $K^(n+1)$+Number of $x=f(y_1,​\ldots,​y_n)$ literals ​is: $K^{n+1}$
  
 Note: if we did not have only flat literals, we could have infinitely many atomic formulas, because of arbitrarily large terms. Note: if we did not have only flat literals, we could have infinitely many atomic formulas, because of arbitrarily large terms.