LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_5_skeleton [2007/03/28 10:50]
vkuncak
sav07_lecture_5_skeleton [2007/03/28 11:08]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lecture 5 Skeleton ====== ====== Lecture 5 Skeleton ======
  
- +Two important techniques: 
- +  * Nelson-Oppen combination method 
- +  * Resolution
  
 ===== Basic idea of Nelson-Oppen combination ===== ===== Basic idea of Nelson-Oppen combination =====
Line 45: Line 44:
   * the same number of nodes   * the same number of nodes
   * same properties on shared symbols (equality and sometimes more)   * same properties on shared symbols (equality and sometimes more)
 +
 +Lazy approach to integrating solvers for conjunctions and SAT solvers
  
 ==== General case ==== ==== General case ====
Line 78: Line 79:
   * f(5)   * f(5)
   * ALL x. 0 <= x --> f(x) > 0   * ALL x. 0 <= x --> f(x) > 0
 +
  
  
Line 101: Line 103:
 Two different techniques (recall we can take negation of formulas): Two different techniques (recall we can take negation of formulas):
   * Enumerating finite models (last time) gives us a way to show formula is satisfiable   * Enumerating finite models (last time) gives us a way to show formula is satisfiable
-  * Enumerating proofs gives us a way to show that formula is valid+  * Enumerating proofs gives us a way to show that formula is valid: semi decision procedure (complete but non-terminating)
 The gap in the middle: invalid formulas with only infinite models The gap in the middle: invalid formulas with only infinite models
   * an example with only infinite models: strict partial order with no upper bound   * an example with only infinite models: strict partial order with no upper bound
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
  
 ===== Resolution theorem proving ===== ===== Resolution theorem proving =====