LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/21 10:17]
vkuncak
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/21 10:39]
vkuncak
Line 150: Line 150:
  
 Proof: small model theorem. Proof: small model theorem.
 +
  
  
Line 162: Line 163:
 Next: reduce to integer linear programming:​ Next: reduce to integer linear programming:​
 \begin{equation*} \begin{equation*}
-  ​Ax = b, x \geq 0+  ​A\vec x \vec b, \vec x \geq \vec 0
 \end{equation*} \end{equation*}
 where $A \in {\cal Z}^{m,n}$ and $x \in {\cal Z}^n$. where $A \in {\cal Z}^{m,n}$ and $x \in {\cal Z}^n$.
Line 183: Line 184:
 Moreover, one can improve these bounds. ​ One tool based on these ideas is [[http://​www.cs.cmu.edu/​~uclid/​|UCLID]]. Moreover, one can improve these bounds. ​ One tool based on these ideas is [[http://​www.cs.cmu.edu/​~uclid/​|UCLID]].
  
-Alternative:​ enumerate disjuncts of DNF on demand, each disjunct is a conjunction,​ then use ILP techniques (often first solve the underlying linear programming problem over reals).  ​Most SMT tools are based on this idea (along with Nelson-Oppen combination:​ next class).+Alternative:​ enumerate disjuncts of DNF on demand, each disjunct is a conjunction,​ then use ILP techniques (often first solve the underlying linear programming problem over reals).  ​Many SMT tools are based on this idea (along with Nelson-Oppen combination:​ next class).
   * [[http://​www.cs.nyu.edu/​acsys/​cvc3/​download.html|CVC3]] (successor of CVC Lite)   * [[http://​www.cs.nyu.edu/​acsys/​cvc3/​download.html|CVC3]] (successor of CVC Lite)
   * [[http://​combination.cs.uiowa.edu/​smtlib/​|SMT-LIB]] Standard for formulas, competition   * [[http://​combination.cs.uiowa.edu/​smtlib/​|SMT-LIB]] Standard for formulas, competition