LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/20 17:19]
vkuncak
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/20 17:34]
vkuncak
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 ===== Converting programs (with simple values) to formulas ===== ===== Converting programs (with simple values) to formulas =====
 +
  
  
Line 13: Line 14:
 <​latex>​ <​latex>​
 \{((x_0,​y_0),​(x,​y)) \mid F \} \{((x_0,​y_0),​(x,​y)) \mid F \}
-</​latex> ​     +</​latex>​ 
 where F is some formula that has x,y,x_0,y_0 as free variables. where F is some formula that has x,y,x_0,y_0 as free variables.
  
Line 96: Line 98:
  
 Symbolic execution converts programs into formulas by going forward. ​ It is therefore somewhat analogous to the way an [[interpreter]] for the language would work.  It is based on the notion of strongest postcondition. Symbolic execution converts programs into formulas by going forward. ​ It is therefore somewhat analogous to the way an [[interpreter]] for the language would work.  It is based on the notion of strongest postcondition.
 +
  
 ==== Weakest preconditions ==== ==== Weakest preconditions ====
Line 101: Line 104:
 While symbolic execution computes formula by going forward along the program syntax tree, weakest precondition computes formula by going backward. While symbolic execution computes formula by going forward along the program syntax tree, weakest precondition computes formula by going backward.
  
-==== Papers ====+===== Proving quantifier-free linear arithmetic formulas ===== 
 + 
 +===== Papers ​=====
  
   * Verification condition generation in Spec#: http://​research.microsoft.com/​~leino/​papers/​krml157.pdf   * Verification condition generation in Spec#: http://​research.microsoft.com/​~leino/​papers/​krml157.pdf