LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/18 19:55]
vkuncak
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/20 14:10]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Lecture 3 (Skeleton) ======
 +
 +Recall that we can
 +  * represent programs using guarded command language, e.g. desugaring of '​if'​ into non-deterministic choice and assume
 +  * give meaning to guarded command language statements as relations
 +  * we can represent relations using set comprehensions;​ if our program has two state components, we can represent its meaning as
 +<​latex>​
 +\{((x_0,​y_0),​(x,​y)) \mid F \}
 +</​latex> ​     ​
 +    where F is some formula that mentions x,​y,​x_0,​y_0.
 +
 +Our goal is to compute this formula.
 +
 +
  
 ==== Papers ==== ==== Papers ====
  
   * Verification condition generation in Spec#: http://​research.microsoft.com/​~leino/​papers/​krml157.pdf   * Verification condition generation in Spec#: http://​research.microsoft.com/​~leino/​papers/​krml157.pdf
 +  * Loop invariant inference for set algebra formulas: {{hob-tcs.pdf}}
 +  * Induction-iteration method for machine code checking: http://​www.cs.wisc.edu/​wpis/​papers/​pldi00.ps
 +
   * Presburger Arithmetic (PA) bounds: {{papadimitriou81complexityintegerprogramming.pdf}}   * Presburger Arithmetic (PA) bounds: {{papadimitriou81complexityintegerprogramming.pdf}}
   * Specializing PA bounds: http://​www.lmcs-online.org/​ojs/​viewarticle.php?​id=43&​layout=abstract   * Specializing PA bounds: http://​www.lmcs-online.org/​ojs/​viewarticle.php?​id=43&​layout=abstract