LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/18 19:52]
vkuncak created
sav07_lecture_3_skeleton [2007/03/20 14:10]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Lecture 3 (Skeleton) ======
 +
 +Recall that we can
 +  * represent programs using guarded command language, e.g. desugaring of '​if'​ into non-deterministic choice and assume
 +  * give meaning to guarded command language statements as relations
 +  * we can represent relations using set comprehensions;​ if our program has two state components, we can represent its meaning as
 +<​latex>​
 +\{((x_0,​y_0),​(x,​y)) \mid F \}
 +</​latex> ​     ​
 +    where F is some formula that mentions x,​y,​x_0,​y_0.
 +
 +Our goal is to compute this formula.
 +
 +
  
 ==== Papers ==== ==== Papers ====
  
-Compact verification conditions using weakest preconditions: http://​research.microsoft.com/​~leino/​papers/​krml157.pdf +  ​Verification condition generation in Spec#: http://​research.microsoft.com/​~leino/​papers/​krml157.pdf 
-* Presburger Arithmetic (PA) bounds: {{papadimitriou81complexityintegerprogramming.pdf}} +  * Loop invariant inference for set algebra formulas: {{hob-tcs.pdf}} 
-* Specializing PA bounds: http://​www.lmcs-online.org/​ojs/​viewarticle.php?​id=43&​layout=abstract+  * Induction-iteration method for machine code checking: http://​www.cs.wisc.edu/​wpis/​papers/​pldi00.ps 
 + 
 +  ​* Presburger Arithmetic (PA) bounds: {{papadimitriou81complexityintegerprogramming.pdf}} 
 +  * Specializing PA bounds: http://​www.lmcs-online.org/​ojs/​viewarticle.php?​id=43&​layout=abstract