LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_2 [2007/03/21 20:11]
vaibhav.rajan
sav07_lecture_2 [2007/03/22 20:32]
vkuncak
Line 505: Line 505:
  
 Weakest preconditions of assignments make wp very appealing. Weakest preconditions of assignments make wp very appealing.
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
-===== Proving validity of linear arithmetic formulas ===== 
- 
-Quantifier-Free Presburger arithmetic 
- 
-<​latex>​ 
-\begin{array}{l} 
-\land, \lor, \lnot, \\ 
-x + y, K \cdot x, x < y, x=y 
-\end{array} 
-</​latex>​ 
- 
-Validity versus satisfiability. ​ For all possible values of integers. 
- 
-Reduction to integer linear programming. 
- 
-Small model property. 
- 
-See, for example, {{papadimitriou81complexityintegerprogramming.pdf|paper by Papadimitriou}}. 
- 
-If we know more about the structure of solutions, we can take advantage of it as in  
-{{seshiabryant04decidingquantifierfreepresburgerformulas.pdf|the paper by Seshia and Bryant}}. 
- 
  
  
Line 582: Line 555:
 left, right - uninterpreted functions (can have any value, depending on the program, unlike arithmetic functions such as +,-,* that have fixed interpretation). left, right - uninterpreted functions (can have any value, depending on the program, unlike arithmetic functions such as +,-,* that have fixed interpretation).
  
-===== Reasoning about uninterpreted function symbols ===== 
- 
-Essentially:​ quantifier-free first-order logic with equality. 
  
-What are properties of equality? 
  
-Congruence closure algorithm. ​ Here is {{nelsonoppen80decisionprocedurescongruenceclosure.pdf|the original paper by Nelson and Oppen}}.  ​