LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_20 [2007/06/05 11:02]
kremena.diatchka
sav07_lecture_20 [2007/06/05 11:19]
kremena.diatchka
Line 163: Line 163:
   modifies: FileState   modifies: FileState
   ensures: ​ FileState = open   ensures: ​ FileState = open
 +
 +
  
  
Line 210: Line 212:
 === Convergence of automata for reachable configurations === === Convergence of automata for reachable configurations ===
  
-One of the main results of this paper is an algorithm which, given a set of states S, computes the set of all predecessors of S, denoted by $pre^{*}(S)$. The states in $pre^{*}(S)$ are regular, i.e. they can be represented using a finite state automaton.+One of the main results of this paper is an algorithm which, given a set of states ​$S$, computes the set of all predecessors of $S$, denoted by $pre^{*}(S)$. The states in $pre^{*}(S)$ are regular, i.e. they can be represented using a finite state automaton.
  
 In the paper, a pushdown system is defined as a triplet $\mathcal{P} = (P, \Gamma, \Delta)$ where In the paper, a pushdown system is defined as a triplet $\mathcal{P} = (P, \Gamma, \Delta)$ where
Line 239: Line 241:
   * if $q \stackrel{\w}{\longrightarrow} q''​$ and $q''​ \stackrel{\gamma}{\longrightarrow} q'$ then $q \stackrel{w\gamma}{\longrightarrow} q'$   * if $q \stackrel{\w}{\longrightarrow} q''​$ and $q''​ \stackrel{\gamma}{\longrightarrow} q'$ then $q \stackrel{w\gamma}{\longrightarrow} q'$
    
-$\mathcal{A}$ accepts or recognizes a configuration $\langle p^{i},w \rangle$ if $s^{i} \stackrel{w}{\longrightarrow} q$ for some $q \in F$. The set of configurations recognized by $\mathcal{A}$ is denoted $Conf($\mathcal{A}$)$. As stated before, a set of configurations is regular if it recognized by some MA.   +$\mathcal{A}$ accepts or recognizes a configuration $\langle p^{i},w \rangle$ if $s^{i} \stackrel{w}{\longrightarrow} q$ for some $q \in F$. The set of configurations recognized by $\mathcal{A}$ is denoted $Conf(\mathcal{A})$. As stated before, a set of configurations is regular if it recognized by some MA.    
 + 
 +Section 2.2 of the paper explains how, given a regular set of configurations $C$ of a PDS $\mathcal{P}$ recognized by an MA $\mathcal{A}$,​ we can construct another MA $\mathcal{A}_{pre*}$ recognizing $pre^{*}(C)$ (refer to paper for details).
  
 +So the idea in the end is to make $C$ include those undesirable (error) states, and then check whether $pre^{*}(C)$ includes the starting state configurations (in other words, whether any of the error states are reachable from the start state). ​
  
 ==== References ==== ==== References ====