LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_lecture_18 [2007/05/29 00:37]
vasu.singh
sav07_lecture_18 [2007/05/29 00:43]
vasu.singh
Line 27: Line 27:
 This suggests that the two programs above are not equivalent for the purpose of reasoning This suggests that the two programs above are not equivalent for the purpose of reasoning
 in concurrently executing programs. in concurrently executing programs.
 +
  
  
Line 97: Line 98:
   end   end
   { b = x + y }   { b = x + y }
 +
 +In our language, this example can be expressed as 
 +  ​
 +  (atomic(x:​=x+1;​y:​=y-1)[]atomic(x:​=x-1;​y:​=y+1))* || (atomic(x:​=x+1;​y:​=y-1)[]atomic(x:​=x-1;​y:​=y+1))*
 +
 +$ = (r1[]r2)^*||(r3[]r4)^* \subseteq (r1 [] r2 [] r3 [] r4)^*$
  
 ==== Global reachability invariants ==== ==== Global reachability invariants ====