LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav07_homework_2 [2007/03/29 22:19]
vkuncak
sav07_homework_2 [2007/03/30 13:56]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Homework 2 ====== ====== Homework 2 ======
 +
  
  
Line 23: Line 24:
 For in depth understanding you can also read references in there, in particular the relevant Wilfrid Hodges model theory book sections. For in depth understanding you can also read references in there, in particular the relevant Wilfrid Hodges model theory book sections.
  
-**Hint**: You should be able to reduce the problem to reasoning about conjunctions and generate a disjunction over total orders over terms of form v+c.  Alternatively,​ you may be able to use some ideas of [[http://​citeseer.ist.psu.edu/​71579.html|Fourier-Motzkin elimination]].+**Hint**: You should be able to reduce the problem to reasoning about conjunctions and generate a disjunction over total orders over terms of form v+c.  Alternatively,​ you may be able to use some ideas of [[http://​citeseer.ist.psu.edu/​71579.html|Fourier-Motzkin elimination]], but it is not necessary for this problem to have an efficient algorithm, only an algorithm that works in principle. 
 + 
  
 ==== Verification condition generator ==== ==== Verification condition generator ====
Line 36: Line 39:
       | while [inv F] (F) { S }        | while [inv F] (F) { S } 
       | if (F) { S } else { S }       | if (F) { S } else { S }
-  T ::= T+T | T-T | K*T | v +  T ::= T+T | T-T | K*T | v | K 
-  A ::= T=T | T < T+  A ::= T=T | T < T | True | False
   F ::= A | (F&F) | (F|F) | ~F | ALL v.F | EX v.F   F ::= A | (F&F) | (F|F) | ~F | ALL v.F | EX v.F
   K ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | ...   K ::= 0 | 1 | 2 | ...