LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
partial_order [2008/04/30 15:20]
vkuncak
partial_order [2008/05/07 16:26]
pedagand
Line 12: Line 12:
 Given a partial ordering relation $\le$, the corresponding **strict ordering relation** $x < y$ is defined by $x \le y \land x \neq y$ and can be viewed as a shorthand for this conjunction. Given a partial ordering relation $\le$, the corresponding **strict ordering relation** $x < y$ is defined by $x \le y \land x \neq y$ and can be viewed as a shorthand for this conjunction.
  
-We can view partial order $(A,r)$ as a first-order interpretation $I=(A,​\alpha)$ of language ${\cal L}={\le\}$ where $\alpha({\le\})=r$.+We can view partial order $(A,r)$ as a first-order interpretation $I=(A,​\alpha)$ of language ${\cal L}=\{\le\}$ where $\alpha({\le})=r$.
  
 ===== Example Partial Orders ===== ===== Example Partial Orders =====
Line 38: Line 38:
   * **least element** of $S$ if $a \in S$ and for all $a' \in S$ we have $a \le a'$   * **least element** of $S$ if $a \in S$ and for all $a' \in S$ we have $a \le a'$
   * **least upper bound** (lub, supremum, meet, $\sqcup$) of $S$ if $a$ is the least element in the set of all upper bounds of $S$   * **least upper bound** (lub, supremum, meet, $\sqcup$) of $S$ if $a$ is the least element in the set of all upper bounds of $S$
-  * **greatest lower bound** (glb, infimum, join, $\sqcap$) of $S$ if $a$ is the least element in the set of all upper bounds of $S$+  * **greatest lower bound** (glb, infimum, join, $\sqcap$) of $S$ if $a$ is the greatest ​element in the set of all lower bounds of $S$
  
 Taking $S=A$ we obtain minimal, maximal, greatest, least elements for the entire partial order. Taking $S=A$ we obtain minimal, maximal, greatest, least elements for the entire partial order.