LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
msol_over_strings [2007/05/27 13:44]
vaibhav.rajan
msol_over_strings [2008/05/14 19:23]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== MSOL over Strings ====== ====== MSOL over Strings ======
- 
- 
- 
  
 ===== Syntax and Semantics of Weak Monadic Second-Order Logic over Strings ===== ===== Syntax and Semantics of Weak Monadic Second-Order Logic over Strings =====
Line 29: Line 26:
   [\![\exists v. F]\!]e &=& \exists S. S\ \mbox{is finite}\ \land\ S \subseteq N_0 \land [\![F]\!](e[v \mapsto S])   [\![\exists v. F]\!]e &=& \exists S. S\ \mbox{is finite}\ \land\ S \subseteq N_0 \land [\![F]\!](e[v \mapsto S])
 \end{eqnarray*} \end{eqnarray*}
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
  
 ===== What can we express in MSOL over strings ===== ===== What can we express in MSOL over strings =====
Line 59: Line 51:
 \end{equation*} \end{equation*}
  
-This does not give the smallest set containing both $u$ and $v$. The reflexive transitive closure, T is: 
-\begin{equation*} 
-(F \subseteq T )\land (\forall x. x \in S \rightarrow (x,x) \in T ) \land ((\exists k.(u,k) \in T \land (k,v) \in T) \rightarrow ((u,v) \in T)) 
-\end{equation*} 
-The underlying smallest set S containing $u$ and $v$ is given by: 
-\begin{equation*} 
-S = \{x | \exists k. ((k, x) \in T \lor (x,k) \in T) \} 
-\end{equation*} ​ 
 **Using transitive closure and successors:​** **Using transitive closure and successors:​**
   * Constant zero: $(x=0) = One(x) \land \lnot (\exists y. One(y) \land s(y,x))$   * Constant zero: $(x=0) = One(x) \land \lnot (\exists y. One(y) \land s(y,x))$