Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
expressing_finite_automata_in_msol_over_strings [2009/04/29 11:01] vkuncak |
expressing_finite_automata_in_msol_over_strings [2009/04/29 11:09] vkuncak |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| Consider a finite automaton with alphabet $\Sigma=\{0,1\}^n$, states $Q = \{q_0,q_1,\ldots,q_m\}$, transition relation $\Delta$, initial state $q_0$ and final states $F$. | Consider a finite automaton with alphabet $\Sigma=\{0,1\}^n$, states $Q = \{q_0,q_1,\ldots,q_m\}$, transition relation $\Delta$, initial state $q_0$ and final states $F$. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Let the sets $v_i$ denote the encoding of input string of the automaton. | ||
| There exists an execution of an automaton iff there exist the intermediate states given by transition relation $\Delta$. We describe intermediate states using sets $Q_0,\ldots,Q_m$, one for each state of the in $Q$. The state $Q_i$ is the set of positions in the execution at which the automaton is in state $q_i$. We encode the transition relation $\Delta$ using the formula | There exists an execution of an automaton iff there exist the intermediate states given by transition relation $\Delta$. We describe intermediate states using sets $Q_0,\ldots,Q_m$, one for each state of the in $Q$. The state $Q_i$ is the set of positions in the execution at which the automaton is in state $q_i$. We encode the transition relation $\Delta$ using the formula | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
| \end{equation*} | \end{equation*} | ||
| - | Note: we need to take care of the end of the string as well, by introducing the set of all positions in the input string. | + | |