LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
equivalence_relation [2007/03/30 20:36]
vkuncak
equivalence_relation [2007/03/30 20:45]
vkuncak
Line 8: Line 8:
  
   * $x \sim y\ \land\ y \sim z\ \rightarrow\ x \sim z$   * $x \sim y\ \land\ y \sim z\ \rightarrow\ x \sim z$
 +
 +Given an equivalence relation $\sim$, we define the set of equivalence classes $A_{\sim}$ by
 +\begin{equation*}
 +  A_{\sim} = \{ \{y \mid x \sim y\} \mid x \in A \}
 +\end{equation*}
 +
 +The equivalence classes of a non-empty set form a [[partition]] of $A$.  ​
 +
 +Conversely, given a [[partition]] $P \subseteq 2^A$ of set $A$, the relation defined by 
 +\begin{equation*}
 +  x \sim y\ \iff\ \exists S \in P. \{x,y\} \subseteq S
 +\end{equation*}
 +is an equivalence relation such that $A_{\sim} = P$.