LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:using_automata_to_decide_ws1s [2012/05/15 12:46]
vkuncak
sav08:using_automata_to_decide_ws1s [2012/05/15 15:11]
vkuncak
Line 14: Line 14:
 \] \]
  
-Instead of $e(F)(D,​\alpha(w))={\it true}$ we write for short $w \models F$.+Instead of $e(F)(D,​\alpha(w))={\it true}$ we write for short $w \models F$. So, we design automata so that: 
 +\[ 
 +    w \in L(A(F)) \ \ \ \iff \ \ \ w \models F 
 +\]
  
 The following lemma follows from the definition of semantic evaluation function '​e'​ and the shorthand $w \models F$. The following lemma follows from the definition of semantic evaluation function '​e'​ and the shorthand $w \models F$.
Line 100: Line 103:
 **Example 1:** Compute automaton for formula $\exists X. \lnot (X \subseteq Y)$. **Example 1:** Compute automaton for formula $\exists X. \lnot (X \subseteq Y)$.
  
-**Example 2:** Compute automaton for formula $\exists Y. (X < Y)$ where $<$ is interpreted treating $X,Y$ as digits of natural numbers.+**Example 2:** Compute automaton for formula $\exists Y. (X < Y)$ where $<$ is interpreted treating $X,Y$ as digits of natural numbers. Also compute the automaton for the formula $\exists X. (X < Y)$.
  
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====