LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:standard-model_semantics_of_hol [2008/05/28 02:19]
vkuncak
sav08:standard-model_semantics_of_hol [2008/05/28 02:24]
vkuncak
Line 30: Line 30:
 We call an interpretation $((D_t)_t, \alpha)$ a //general model// if there exists a meaning function $e$ mapping each term of type $t$ to element of $D_t$ such that for all interpretations $\varphi$ the following holds: We call an interpretation $((D_t)_t, \alpha)$ a //general model// if there exists a meaning function $e$ mapping each term of type $t$ to element of $D_t$ such that for all interpretations $\varphi$ the following holds:
 \[\begin{array}{l} \[\begin{array}{l}
-  e(\phi)(x) = \phi(x) \\ +  e(\varphi)(x) = \varphi(x) \\ 
-  e(\phi)(c) = \alpha(c) \mbox{ i{}f } c \mbox { is a constant } \\ +  e(\varphi)(c) = \alpha(c) \mbox{ i{}f } c \mbox { is a constant } \\ 
-  e(\phi)(F_1 F_2) = (e(\phi)(F_1))(e(\phi)(F_2)) \mbox{ (evaluate both arguments, perform function application) }\\ +  e(\varphi)(F_1 F_2) = (e(\varphi)(F_1))(e(\varphi)(F_2)) \mbox{ (evaluate both arguments, perform function application) }\\ 
-  e(\phi)(\lambda x_t. B) = f \mbox{ where } f(v) = e(\phi[x:=v])(B) \mbox{ for all } v \in D_t+  e(\varphi)(\lambda x_t. B) = f \mbox{ where } f(v) = e(\varphi[x:=v])(B) \mbox{ for all } v \in D_t
 \end{array} \end{array}
 \] \]