LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:interpretation_quotient_under_congruence [2008/04/02 22:20]
vkuncak
sav08:interpretation_quotient_under_congruence [2008/04/02 22:36]
vkuncak
Line 77: Line 77:
 \] \]
  
-**Lemma 1:** $I_Q = ([D],I_Q)$ is a well-defined interpretation,​ that is, +**Lemma 1:** For each function symbol $f$ with $ar(f)=n$, the relation $\alpha_Q(f)$ is a total function $[D]^n \to [D]$ and for all $x_1,​\ldots,​x_n \in D$, 
-  * $[D]$ is non-empty;​ +\[ 
-  * for each function symbol $f$ with $ar(f)=n$, the relation $\alpha_Q(f)$ is a total function $[D]^n \to [D]$.+    \alpha_Q(f)([x_1],​\ldots,​[x_n]) = [\alpha(f)(x_1,​\ldots,​x_n)] 
 +\]
  
 **Lemma 2:** For each term $t$ we have $e_T(t)(I_Q) = [e_T(t)(I)]$. **Lemma 2:** For each term $t$ we have $e_T(t)(I_Q) = [e_T(t)(I)]$.