LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:ground_terms [2009/05/13 10:29]
vkuncak
sav08:ground_terms [2013/05/10 09:53]
vkuncak
Line 23: Line 23:
 Let $ar(f)=n$. ​ Then $f : GT^n \to GT$ Let $ar(f)=n$. ​ Then $f : GT^n \to GT$
  
-$\alpha_H(f)(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n) =$ ++| $f(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n)$+++$\alpha_H(f)(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n) = f(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n)$
  
 This defines $\alpha_H(f)$. ​ How to define $\alpha_H(R)$ to ensure that elements of a set are true, i.e. that $e_S(S)(I_H) = {\it true}$?\\ This defines $\alpha_H(f)$. ​ How to define $\alpha_H(R)$ to ensure that elements of a set are true, i.e. that $e_S(S)(I_H) = {\it true}$?\\
 Partition $GT^n$ in two sets, one over which $\alpha_H(R)(t_1,​...,​t_n)$ is true and the other over which it is false. Partition $GT^n$ in two sets, one over which $\alpha_H(R)(t_1,​...,​t_n)$ is true and the other over which it is false.
-  * is this possible for arbitrary set? ++| no +++  * is this possible for arbitrary set? no 
  
 **Example** **Example**