LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:deriving_propositional_resolution [2008/03/19 17:12]
tatjana
sav08:deriving_propositional_resolution [2008/03/19 17:13]
tatjana
Line 44: Line 44:
    ​ProjectSet(S,​p) = \{ ProjectForm(F_1,​F_2,​p) \mid F_1,F_2 \in S \}    ​ProjectSet(S,​p) = \{ ProjectForm(F_1,​F_2,​p) \mid F_1,F_2 \in S \}
 \] \]
 +
  
 ==== Projection Proof Rules ==== ==== Projection Proof Rules ====
Line 54: Line 55:
 \] \]
 The soundness of projection rule follows from the fact that  The soundness of projection rule follows from the fact that 
-for every interpretation $I$, if $I \models S$, then also $I \models ​Proj(S,p)$.+for every interpretation $I$, if $I \models S$, then also $I \models ​ProjectSet(S,p)$.
  
 Applying the projection rule we obtain formulas with fewer and fewer variables. ​ We therefore also add the "​ground contradiction rule" Applying the projection rule we obtain formulas with fewer and fewer variables. ​ We therefore also add the "​ground contradiction rule"