LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision Both sides next revision
sav08:compactness_for_first-order_logic [2008/03/20 12:25]
vkuncak created
sav08:compactness_for_first-order_logic [2008/03/20 17:51]
vkuncak
Line 3: Line 3:
 Let $S_0$ be a set of first-order formulas. Let $S_0$ be a set of first-order formulas.
  
-Suppose $S_0$ has no model. ​ Then $expandProp(clauses(S_0))$ has no model. ​ Some finite subset of it has no model.  ​Some finite subset of $clauses(S_0)$ has no model. ​Some finite subset ​of $S_0$ has no model.+Suppose $S_0$ has no model.  ​ 
 + 
 +Then $expandProp(clauses(S_0))$ has no model.  ​ 
 + 
 +Some finite subset ​$S_1 \subseteq expandProp(clauses(S_0))$ ​of it has no model.  ​ 
 + 
 +There is then finite subset of clauses ​$S_2 \subseteq ​clauses(S_0)$ that generate $S_1$, i.e. such that $S_1 \subseteq expandProp(S_2)$. ​ Therefore, $S_2$ has no model. 
 + 
 +These clauses are generated by a finite subset $S_3 \subseteq ​S_0$, i.e. $S_2 \subseteq clauses(S_3)$. 
 + 
 +Therefore $S_3$ has no model.