Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
fmcad11 [2011/08/14 12:12] vkuncak |
fmcad11 [2011/08/24 14:46] vkuncak |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| Please double-check that the zip file contains all the sources necessary for a standard compilation of your paper. Physically putting all included files inside your latex source is recommended - it will make our life easier. | Please double-check that the zip file contains all the sources necessary for a standard compilation of your paper. Physically putting all included files inside your latex source is recommended - it will make our life easier. | ||
| - | |||
| ===== Copyright Form ===== | ===== Copyright Form ===== | ||
| Line 53: | Line 52: | ||
| http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/sigfaq#a14 | http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/sigfaq#a14 | ||
| + | As a quick tip, if you are using a recent latex installation, what tends to work | ||
| + | for a good pdf file is the following. Use latex and then dvips to build a | ||
| + | postscript file. Then run this script: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ps2pdf14 -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress input.ps output.pdf | ||
| + | |||
| + | where input.ps is your postscript file produced by dvips, and output.pdf will be the new pdf file. You can check that fonts are embedded and that there are no basic internal errors by running | ||
| + | |||
| + | pdffonts output.pdf | ||
| + | |||
| + | However, note that this method is not perfect. To be sure that the fonts were indeed embedded, you can open the file with an Adobe Acrobat Reader, select File, Properties and click on the Fonts tab (this works in Version 10). Adobe professional tools should in principle be able to deal with diagnostics more reliably. | ||
| ==== Word ==== | ==== Word ==== | ||