LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
sav08:preliminary_discussion_on_models [2008/03/20 13:40]
vkuncak
sav08:preliminary_discussion_on_models [2009/05/14 12:34]
vkuncak
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Model Sizes ====== ====== Model Sizes ======
  
-We sawif formula has a model of some size, it has many models of same size, from [[Isomorphism of Interpretations]].+Difficulty in semantic definition of validity and satisfiabilitythe definitions talk about **arbitrary** models (finite models, integers, real numbers, set theory, ...) 
 + 
 +If formula has a model of some size, it has many models of same size, from [[Isomorphism of Interpretations]].
  
 Are there first-order formulas that have only finite models? Are there first-order formulas that have only finite models?
Line 7: Line 9:
 Are there first-order formulas that have only infinite models? Are there first-order formulas that have only infinite models?
  
-What is the cardinality of the models we need to consider? ​ There are many useful models whose domain is not a [[countable set]].+What is the cardinality of the models we need to consider? ​ There are many useful models whose domain is not a [[countable set]] (e.g. real numbers).
  
 Difficulty in checking $\models S$: there are infinitely many models, of arbitrarily large cardinalities. Difficulty in checking $\models S$: there are infinitely many models, of arbitrarily large cardinalities.
  
 Goal: show that if a set $S$ of formulas has a model, then it has a particular kind, and this model is countable. Goal: show that if a set $S$ of formulas has a model, then it has a particular kind, and this model is countable.
 +  * this will also give us a systematic method to search for unsatisfiable (and thus, for valid) formulas
 +