LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sav08:notes_on_congruences [2009/05/06 10:00]
vkuncak
sav08:notes_on_congruences [2009/05/06 11:56]
vkuncak
Line 5: Line 5:
 We next fix $D$ as well as functions and relations and consider the set of all congruences on the set $D$ with respect to these functions and relations.  ​ We next fix $D$ as well as functions and relations and consider the set of all congruences on the set $D$ with respect to these functions and relations.  ​
  
-We assume no relation symbols other than congruence itself. ​ We can represent predicate $p(x_1,​\ldots,​x_n)$ as $f_p(x_1,​\ldots,​x_n)=true$.+We assume no relation symbols other than congruence itself.  ​(We represent ​predicate $p(x_1,​\ldots,​x_n)$ as $f_p(x_1,​\ldots,​x_n)=true$.
  
 ===== Intersection of Congruences ===== ===== Intersection of Congruences =====
Line 35: Line 36:
 \[\begin{array}{rcl} \[\begin{array}{rcl}
  ​\bigwedge_{i=0}^n (x_i,y_1) \in \bigcap S & \rightarrow & \bigwedge_{i=0}^n (x_i,y_1) \in r_1,r_2 \\  ​\bigwedge_{i=0}^n (x_i,y_1) \in \bigcap S & \rightarrow & \bigwedge_{i=0}^n (x_i,y_1) \in r_1,r_2 \\
- ​r_1,​r_2 ~~ \text{congruence relations} & \rightarrow & f(x_1,​\ldots,​ x_n) f(y_1,​\ldots,​ y_n) \in r_1,r_2 \\+ ​r_1,​r_2 ~~ \text{congruence relations} & \rightarrow & (f(x_1,​\ldots,​ x_n)f(y_1,​\ldots,​ y_n)) \in r_1,r_2 \\
  & \rightarrow & f(x_1,​\ldots,​ x_n) = f(y_1,​\ldots,​ y_n) \in \bigcap S  & \rightarrow & f(x_1,​\ldots,​ x_n) = f(y_1,​\ldots,​ y_n) \in \bigcap S
 \end{array} \] \end{array} \]