LARA

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sav08:ground_terms [2009/05/13 10:29]
vkuncak
sav08:ground_terms [2013/05/10 11:02]
vkuncak
Line 15: Line 15:
 If ${\cal L}$ has no constants then $GT$ is empty. ​ In that case, we add a fresh constant $a_0$ into the language and consider ${\cal L} \cup \{a_0\}$ that has a non-empty $GT$.  We call the set $GT$ Herbrand Universe. If ${\cal L}$ has no constants then $GT$ is empty. ​ In that case, we add a fresh constant $a_0$ into the language and consider ${\cal L} \cup \{a_0\}$ that has a non-empty $GT$.  We call the set $GT$ Herbrand Universe.
  
-Goal: show that if a formula //without equality// (for now) has a model, then it has a model whose domain is Herbrand universe, that is, a model of the form $I_H = (HU,​\alpha_H)$.+Goal: show that if a formula //without equality// (for now) has a model, then it has a model whose domain is Herbrand universe, that is, a model of the form $I_H = (GT,​\alpha_H)$.
  
 How to define $\alpha_H$? How to define $\alpha_H$?
Line 23: Line 23:
 Let $ar(f)=n$. ​ Then $f : GT^n \to GT$ Let $ar(f)=n$. ​ Then $f : GT^n \to GT$
  
-$\alpha_H(f)(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n) =$ ++| $f(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n)$+++$\alpha_H(f)(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n) = f(t_1,​\ldots,​t_n)$
  
 This defines $\alpha_H(f)$. ​ How to define $\alpha_H(R)$ to ensure that elements of a set are true, i.e. that $e_S(S)(I_H) = {\it true}$?\\ This defines $\alpha_H(f)$. ​ How to define $\alpha_H(R)$ to ensure that elements of a set are true, i.e. that $e_S(S)(I_H) = {\it true}$?\\
 Partition $GT^n$ in two sets, one over which $\alpha_H(R)(t_1,​...,​t_n)$ is true and the other over which it is false. Partition $GT^n$ in two sets, one over which $\alpha_H(R)(t_1,​...,​t_n)$ is true and the other over which it is false.
-  * is this possible for arbitrary set? ++| no +++  * is this possible for arbitrary set? no 
  
 **Example** **Example**