Does “Node Ordering Constraint” bug reported in paper works for more than 3 nodes?
Answer: Maybe, but this particular scenario does not work for large rings.
Description: This figure show the scenario of that bug which is described in paper:
However, as described in the bellow figure, it requires that a new successor of (i.e. ) to be in predecessor neighborhood of which implies a small ring.
Question 2:
How long does it take to find ordering bug by exhaustive search in MaceMC, given only 3 node are running?